Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 25 October 2016 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
- 4x better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
- 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 vs 1237
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 299
- 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 vs 4657
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 27.517
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 vs 354.254
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 1.807
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.523 vs 20.323
- 7.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 29.327
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 vs 1870
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 1596
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3309
- 3.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 vs 1870
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 1596
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3309
- Around 79% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 122 vs 68
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops vs 460.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5029 vs 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 vs 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 vs 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 vs 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 vs 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 vs 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 vs 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 vs 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 vs 68 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 5029 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 67.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 4.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 30.523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 223.683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | GP107 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1234 | 586 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Price now | $124.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 1,862 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,300 million |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |