Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel UHD Graphics 630

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt

Date de sortie	1 September 2017 versus 25 October 2016
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt versus 75 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

3.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1290 MHz versus 350 MHz
Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1392 MHz versus 1200 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 58.2 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
26.7x plus de pipelines: 640 versus 24
4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,862 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
4.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5029 versus 1237
Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 versus 299
3.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17466 versus 4657
2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 versus 27.517
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 799.414 versus 354.254
2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 versus 1.807
Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.523 versus 20.323
7.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 versus 29.327
3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7043 versus 1870
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 1596
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3309
3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7043 versus 1870
2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 1596
Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3309
Environ 79% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 122 versus 68

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	1290 MHz versus 350 MHz
Vitesse augmenté	1392 MHz versus 1200 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	58.2 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 versus 24
Performance á point flottant	1,862 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	5029 versus 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	457 versus 299
Geekbench - OpenCL	17466 versus 4657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	67.209 versus 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	799.414 versus 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.536 versus 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	30.523 versus 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	223.683 versus 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	7043 versus 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 versus 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 versus 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	7043 versus 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 versus 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 versus 3309
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	122 versus 68

Comparer les références

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1237

5029

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

299

457

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4657

17466

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

27.517

67.209

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

354.254

799.414

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1.807

4.536

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20.323

30.523

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

29.327

223.683

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1870

7043

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1596

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

3360

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1870

7043

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1596

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3309

3360

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

122

Nom	Intel UHD Graphics 630	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark	1237	5029
PassMark - G2D Mark	299	457
Geekbench - OpenCL	4657	17466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	27.517	67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	354.254	799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.807	4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	20.323	30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	29.327	223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1870	7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1596	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3309	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1870	7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1596	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3309	3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	68	122

Comparer les caractéristiques

	Intel UHD Graphics 630	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Essentiel
Architecture	Generation 9.5	Pascal
Nom de code	Coffee Lake GT2	GP107
Date de sortie	1 September 2017	25 October 2016
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1234	586
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Prix de sortie (MSRP)		$109
Prix maintenant		$124.99
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)		56.95
Infos techniques
Vitesse augmenté	1200 MHz	1392 MHz
Vitesse du noyau	350 MHz	1290 MHz
Performance á point flottant	460.8 gflops	1,862 gflops
Processus de fabrication	14 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	24	640
Taux de remplissage de la texture	28.8 GTexel / s	58.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Compte de transistor	189 million	3,300 million
Noyaux CUDA		640
Température maximale du GPU		97 °C
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
Soutien de G-SYNC
HDCP
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16
Soutien de bus		PCIe 3.0
Hauteur		4.38" (11.1 cm)
Longeur		5.7" (14.5 cm)
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU)		300 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires		None
Largeur		2-slot
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Mémoire
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 / 128 Bit	128 Bit
Mémoire partagé	1	0
RAM maximale		4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire		112 GB / s
Vitesse de mémoire		7008 MHz
Genre de mémoire		GDDR5
Technologies
Quick Sync
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
GameStream
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
VR Ready