Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 64 Watt
• Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 4493
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 12.582
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 1.254
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 vs 18.386
• Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 vs 23.499

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

• 3x more core clock speed: 1058 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 33.9 billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 76% better floating-point performance: 812.5 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 vs 1237
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 vs 299
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 vs 354.254
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 vs 1870
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 3309
• Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 vs 1870
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 3309
• 8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 1749
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 368
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 4493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 12.582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 364.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 1.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 18.386
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 23.499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3478
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3332
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 545

Compare specifications (specs)