Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 64 Watt
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 versus 4493
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 12.582
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 versus 1.254
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 versus 18.386
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 29.327 versus 23.499
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 27 November 2013 |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 64 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 versus 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 versus 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 versus 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 versus 23.499 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
- 3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1058 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 18% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 33.9 billion / sec versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 76% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 812.5 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1749 versus 1237
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 368 versus 299
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 364.463 versus 354.254
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2663 versus 1870
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3478 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 versus 3309
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2663 versus 1870
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3478 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 versus 3309
- 8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 545 versus 68
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1058 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 33.9 billion / sec versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 812.5 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1749 versus 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 368 versus 299 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.463 versus 354.254 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2663 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3478 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3332 versus 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2663 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3478 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3332 versus 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 545 versus 68 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 1749 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 368 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 4493 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 12.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 364.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 1.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 18.386 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 23.499 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3332 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 2663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3332 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 545 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 27 November 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 1003 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Prix maintenant | $144.81 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.05 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 812.5 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 33.9 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 64 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | 2,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini..., 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.70" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 128-bit GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
RAM maximale | 1 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5.0 GB/s | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
TXAA |