Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 8.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 134 Watt
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 25.21
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 3242
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 3242

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

• 2.8x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
• 3.4x better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 vs 1237
• Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 299
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 vs 4657
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 vs 354.254
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 vs 1.807
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 vs 20.323
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 51.009 vs 29.327
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 1596
• Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 1596
• 16.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 3388
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 465
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 9482
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 51.009
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3242
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 1106

Compare specifications (specs)