Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1200 MHz versus 1033 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 8.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 134 Watt
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 versus 25.21
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 versus 3242
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 versus 3242
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 26 March 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz versus 1033 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 134 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 versus 25.21 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 versus 3242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 versus 3242 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- 2.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 350 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 62.7 billion / sec versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 32x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 24
- 3.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,585 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- 2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3388 versus 1237
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 versus 299
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9482 versus 4657
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 561.43 versus 354.254
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.026 versus 1.807
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.868 versus 20.323
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 51.009 versus 29.327
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 versus 1596
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 versus 1596
- 16.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1106 versus 68
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 62.7 billion / sec versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,585 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3388 versus 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 versus 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9482 versus 4657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 versus 354.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 versus 1.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 versus 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 versus 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 versus 1596 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 versus 68 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 3388 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 465 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 9482 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 25.21 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 561.43 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 2.026 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 30.868 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 51.009 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3242 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 3426 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3642 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3242 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 1106 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GK106 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 26 March 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 810 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $169 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 1,585 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 62.7 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 134 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 2,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | One 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.2 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 6.0 GB/s | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550D
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
