Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 980 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

• 2.6x more core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 3.6x more texture fill rate: 102.5 billion / sec vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 56x more pipelines: 1344 vs 24
• 5.3x better floating-point performance: 2,459.5 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4413 vs 1237
• Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 468 vs 299
• 3.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15375 vs 4657
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 36.256 vs 27.517
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1029.267 vs 354.254
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.037 vs 1.807
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.894 vs 20.323
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.191 vs 29.327
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3285 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 3309
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3285 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 3309
• 23.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1615 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 4413
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	299 468
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4657 15375
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 36.256
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 1029.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 3.037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 45.894
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 82.191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3684
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 1615

Compare specifications (specs)