Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1176 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 300 vs 245

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 47.04 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
• 3.3x better floating-point performance: 1,505 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3370 vs 1239
• 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10976 vs 4653
• Around 97% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 vs 27.517
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 vs 354.254
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.692 vs 1.807
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 vs 20.323
• 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.513 vs 29.327
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3309
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3309
• 2.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1231 vs 420

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1239 3370
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	300 245
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4653 10976
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 54.294
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 795.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 3.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 51.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 174.513
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	420 1231

Compare specifications (specs)