Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon R7 M260X

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon R7 M260X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 715 MHz
• Around 68% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 17.16 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1239 vs 988
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 300 vs 161
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 3158
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 3158

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M260X

• Around 77% higher core clock speed: 620 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 19% better floating-point performance: 549.1 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5753 vs 4652
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1893 vs 1870
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1775 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1893 vs 1870
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1775 vs 1596

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M260X

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1239 988
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	300 161
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4652 5753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3158
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 1893
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 1775
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3158

Compare specifications (specs)