Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs AMD Radeon 630
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and AMD Radeon 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1218 MHz
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1727 vs 1512
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 359 vs 222
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3361
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3361
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 13 May 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1218 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 vs 1512 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 vs 222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3361 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 630
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 87% higher texture fill rate: 38.98 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8605 vs 6464
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3467 vs 2899
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3219
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3467 vs 2899
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3219
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1082 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 38.98 GTexel/s vs 20.80 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8605 vs 6464 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3467 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3467 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | AMD Radeon 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 1512 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 | 222 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6464 | 8605 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 3467 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 3467 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | AMD Radeon 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Polaris 23 |
Launch date | 2021 | 13 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 760 | 761 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1218 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | 8 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | 77.95 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | 1247 GFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | 1247 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 256 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | 19.49 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 38.98 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Length | 5.7 inches (145 mm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (7000 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |