Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- 265.3x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 78.4 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 9.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 140 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 vs 30.505
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3365
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3365
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 6 September 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 78.4 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 140 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 vs 30.505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3365 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.8x more pipelines: 960 vs 256
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4014 vs 1727
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 484 vs 359
- Around 76% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11372 vs 6464
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 705.293 vs 543.594
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.085 vs 1.995
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.416 vs 29.322
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 2899
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 3219
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 2899
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 3219
- 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1307 vs 641
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 960 vs 256 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4014 vs 1727 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 484 vs 359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11372 vs 6464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 vs 543.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 vs 1.995 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 vs 29.322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 vs 2899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 3219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 vs 2899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 3219 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 vs 641 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 4014 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 | 484 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6464 | 11372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | 35.416 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | 1307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Kepler |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GK106 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 6 September 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 760 | 757 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 960 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 140 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,981 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 192-bit GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 750 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4290 IGP
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
AMDRadeon 630
