Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs ATI Radeon HD 4290 IGP
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and ATI Radeon HD 4290 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 12.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1727 vs 141
- 19.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 568
- 19.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 568
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 1 March 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 vs 141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 568 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4290 IGP
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 498 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 vs 359
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 498 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 vs 359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4290 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | ATI Radeon HD 4290 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 141 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 | 442 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6464 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 568 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | ATI Radeon HD 4290 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | TeraScale |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | RS880 |
Launch date | 2021 | 1 March 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 760 | 759 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 498 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 181 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 |