Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 175.7x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 118.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3339
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3339

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 8x more pipelines: 2048 vs 256
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3583 vs 3219
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3583 vs 3219

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3339
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3583
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3339

Compare specifications (specs)