Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 495.2x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 42 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 16.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 vs 34.483
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3320
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3320
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 26 March 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 42 billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 vs 34.483 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3320 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 480 vs 256
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4121 vs 1727
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 359
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13144 vs 6464
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 706.104 vs 543.594
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.245 vs 1.995
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.405 vs 29.322
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5110 vs 2899
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3658 vs 3219
- Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5110 vs 2899
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3658 vs 3219
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 480 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4121 vs 1727 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 vs 359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13144 vs 6464 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 706.104 vs 543.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.245 vs 1.995 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.405 vs 29.322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5110 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3658 vs 3219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5110 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3658 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 4121 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 359 | 430 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6464 | 13144 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | 34.483 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | 706.104 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | 4.245 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | 30.405 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 5110 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3658 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3320 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | 0 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 106.875 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Fermi |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GF100 |
Launch date | 2021 | 26 March 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 760 | 758 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $71.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 61.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 42 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,345.0 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way, 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 177.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1848 MHz (3696 data rate) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI |