Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs AMD Radeon Pro 560
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and AMD Radeon Pro 560 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 358.3x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3219 vs 2280
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3349
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3219 vs 2280
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3349
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 18 April 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 vs 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 vs 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 560
- 3x more core clock speed: 907 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 1024 vs 256
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 vs 1736
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 vs 348
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15830 vs 6681
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4695 vs 2899
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4695 vs 2899
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 907 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 256 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 vs 1736 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 vs 348 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15830 vs 6681 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 vs 2899 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 vs 2899 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 560
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | AMD Radeon Pro 560 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1736 | 3475 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 | 724 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6681 | 15830 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 4695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 4695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 750 | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 4.0 |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Polaris 21 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 18 April 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 596 | 624 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 907 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,858 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 81.28 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5080 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 750 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500M
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945A
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P600
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAT1000
