Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • 351.4x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 59.2 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 7.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 110 Watt
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3335
  • 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3335
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 9 October 2012
Texture fill rate 20.80 GTexel/s vs 59.2 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 110 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 11068 vs 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 11068 vs 3335

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

  • 3.1x more core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
  • Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2523 vs 1738
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 348
  • Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7917 vs 6692
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 2899
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3219
  • Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 2899
  • Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3219
  • Around 37% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 881 vs 641
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 928 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 768 vs 256
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2523 vs 1738
PassMark - G2D Mark 406 vs 348
Geekbench - OpenCL 7917 vs 6692
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3948 vs 2899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 vs 3219
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3948 vs 2899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 vs 3219
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 881 vs 641

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1738
2523
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
348
406
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
6692
7917
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2899
3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3219
3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11068
3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2899
3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3219
3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11068
3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
641
881
Name Intel UHD Graphics 750 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark 1738 2523
PassMark - G2D Mark 348 406
Geekbench - OpenCL 6692 7917
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2899 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3219 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 11068 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2899 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3219 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 11068 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 641 881
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 47.404

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 750 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.1 Kepler
Code name Rocket Lake GT1 GK106
Launch date 2021 9 October 2012
Place in performance rating 597 863
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $149
Price now $169.99
Value for money (0-100) 18.72

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz
Compute units 32
Core clock speed 300 MHz 928 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1331 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 665.6 GFLOPS
Pipelines 256 768
Pixel fill rate 10.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 20.80 GTexel/s 59.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 110 Watt
CUDA cores 768
Floating-point performance 1,425 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C
Transistor count 2,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.3
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5.4 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
TXAA