Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• 351.4x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 59.2 billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 7.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 110 Watt
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 vs 23.168
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 29.322 vs 28.29
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3335
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3335

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 928 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
• Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 vs 1724
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 364
• Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7900 vs 6447
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 vs 543.594
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 vs 1.995
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 vs 2899
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3219
• Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 vs 2899
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3219
• Around 37% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 881 vs 641

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 2527
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	364 416
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6447 7900
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.179 23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	543.594 592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.995 2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.322 28.29
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	641 881

Compare specifications (specs)