Intel UHD Graphics vs AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 18.72 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.059 vs 12.111
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 313.603 vs 253.178
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.345 vs 1.211
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1478 vs 921
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 vs 30 June 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 vs 18.72 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.059 vs 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.603 vs 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.345 vs 1.211 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1478 vs 921 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 19.728
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 vs 28.67
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 269
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.777 vs 19.728 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 73.506 vs 28.67 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 304 vs 269 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 23.059 | 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 313.603 | 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.345 | 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.728 | 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.67 | 73.506 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 | 304 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1478 | 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5827 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1677 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1645 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2426 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1677 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Comet Lake GT2 | Oland |
Launch date | 21 Aug 2019 | 30 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1186 | 1201 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 780 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 28.80 | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 |