Intel UHD Graphics vs AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics and AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 54% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 780 MHz
  • Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 28.80 vs 18.72 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.059 vs 12.111
  • Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 313.603 vs 253.178
  • Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.345 vs 1.211
  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1478 vs 921
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 vs 30 June 2016
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 780 MHz
Texture fill rate 28.80 vs 18.72 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.059 vs 12.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 313.603 vs 253.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.345 vs 1.211
PassMark - G3D Mark 1478 vs 921

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
  • Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 23.777 vs 19.728
  • 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 73.506 vs 28.67
  • Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 304 vs 269
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 384 vs 192
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 23.777 vs 19.728
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 73.506 vs 28.67
PassMark - G2D Mark 304 vs 269

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
23.059
12.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
313.603
253.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1.345
1.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.728
23.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
28.67
73.506
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
269
304
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1478
921
Name Intel UHD Graphics AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.059 12.111
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 313.603 253.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.345 1.211
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 19.728 23.777
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 28.67 73.506
PassMark - G2D Mark 269 304
PassMark - G3D Mark 1478 921
Geekbench - OpenCL 5827
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1677
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2426
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1677

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN 1.0
Code name Comet Lake GT2 Oland
Launch date 21 Aug 2019 30 June 2016
Place in performance rating 1186 1201
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 780 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 192 384
Texture fill rate 28.80 18.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt
Core clock speed 730 MHz
Floating-point performance 599.0 gflops
Transistor count 1,040 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3