NVIDIA GRID K1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 610M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K1 and NVIDIA GeForce 610M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K1

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 26% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 672 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 4x 192 vs 48
• 10.1x better floating-point performance: 4x 326.4 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 16x more maximum memory size: 4x 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 651 vs 290
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 259 vs 111
• Around 44% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1976 vs 1373
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.591 vs 2.747
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 169.864 vs 104.498
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.336 vs 0.27
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 8.734 vs 5.832
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 10.43 vs 9.69
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1237 vs 664
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1237 vs 664

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 610M

• 10.8x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 130 Watt
• 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1602 vs 354
• 8.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2848 vs 319
• 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1602 vs 354
• 8.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2848 vs 319

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K1
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 610M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	651 290
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	259 111
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1976 1373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.591 2.747
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	169.864 104.498
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.336 0.27
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.734 5.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.43 9.69
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	319 2848
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1237 664
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354 1602
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	319 2848

Compare specifications (specs)