NVIDIA GRID K220Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K220Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 960
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 1,981 gflops
- 833.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 484
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 July 2014 vs 6 September 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 960 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops vs 1,981 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 539 vs 484 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 745 MHz
- Around 61% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4014 vs 912
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 833
- 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 833
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 2128
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 2128
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 2660
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 2660
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4014 vs 912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3581 vs 833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3581 vs 833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3690 vs 2128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3690 vs 2128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 vs 2660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 vs 2660 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K220Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 912 | 4014 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 539 | 484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 833 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 833 | 3581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2128 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2128 | 3690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2660 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2660 | 3365 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11372 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.505 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 705.293 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.085 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 62.69 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1307 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K220Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK104 | GK106 |
Launch date | 2 July 2014 | 6 September 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $469 | $229 |
Place in performance rating | 755 | 757 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $349.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 960 |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 140 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,540 million |
Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |