NVIDIA GRID K220Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K220Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 22% higher texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec
  • Around 60% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 960
  • Around 16% better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 1,981 gflops
  • 833.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 484
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2 July 2014 vs 6 September 2012
Texture fill rate 95.36 GTexel / s vs 78.4 billion / sec
Pipelines 1536 vs 960
Floating-point performance 2,289 gflops vs 1,981 gflops
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 539 vs 484

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

  • Around 32% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 745 MHz
  • Around 61% lower typical power consumption: 140 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
  • 4.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4014 vs 912
  • 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3581 vs 833
  • 4.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3581 vs 833
  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3690 vs 2128
  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3690 vs 2128
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3365 vs 2660
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3365 vs 2660
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 980 MHz vs 745 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 140 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 4014 vs 912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3581 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3581 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3690 vs 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3690 vs 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3365 vs 2660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3365 vs 2660

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
912
4014
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
539
484
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
833
3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
833
3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2128
3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2128
3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2660
3365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2660
3365
Name NVIDIA GRID K220Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
PassMark - G3D Mark 912 4014
PassMark - G2D Mark 539 484
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 833 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 833 3581
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2128 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2128 3690
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2660 3365
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2660 3365
Geekbench - OpenCL 11372
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 30.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 705.293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 62.69
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1307

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GRID K220Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Kepler
Code name GK104 GK106
Launch date 2 July 2014 6 September 2012
Launch price (MSRP) $469 $229
Place in performance rating 755 757
Type Workstation Desktop
Price now $349.99
Value for money (0-100) 14.35

Technical info

Core clock speed 745 MHz 980 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,289 gflops 1,981 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1536 960
Texture fill rate 95.36 GTexel / s 78.4 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 140 Watt
Transistor count 3,540 million 2,540 million
Boost clock speed 1033 MHz
CUDA cores 960

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 9.5" (24.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s 144.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 192-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 6.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA