NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GRID K220Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3217 vs 912
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4941 vs 833
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2645 vs 2128
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2660
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4941 vs 833
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2645 vs 2128
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2660
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 vs 2 July 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1093 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3217 vs 912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 vs 833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 vs 2128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 2660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 vs 833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 vs 2128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 2660 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- Around 64% better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 312
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops vs 1,399 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 539 vs 312 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K220Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GRID K220Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3217 | 912 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | 539 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10582 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.821 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 793.297 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.631 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 48.966 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 163.204 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4941 | 833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2645 | 2128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 2660 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4941 | 833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2645 | 2128 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 2660 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile | NVIDIA GRID K220Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 11 January 2017 | 2 July 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 759 | 760 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $469 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1093 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,399 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 43.72 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |