NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile and NVIDIA GRID K220Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1093 MHz vs 745 MHz
  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
  • 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3217 vs 912
  • 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4941 vs 833
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2645 vs 2128
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2660
  • 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4941 vs 833
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2645 vs 2128
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2660
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 January 2017 vs 2 July 2014
Core clock speed 1093 MHz vs 745 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3217 vs 912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4941 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2645 vs 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 2660
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4941 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2645 vs 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 2660

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q

  • 2.2x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
  • 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
  • Around 64% better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
  • Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 312
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 95.36 GTexel / s vs 43.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1536 vs 640
Floating-point performance 2,289 gflops vs 1,399 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 539 vs 312

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K220Q

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3217
912
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
312
539
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4941
833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2645
2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
2660
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4941
833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2645
2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
2660
Name NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile NVIDIA GRID K220Q
PassMark - G3D Mark 3217 912
PassMark - G2D Mark 312 539
Geekbench - OpenCL 10582
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 52.821
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 793.297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 48.966
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 163.204
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4941 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2645 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 2660
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4941 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2645 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 2660

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M1200 Mobile NVIDIA GRID K220Q

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Kepler
Code name GM107 GK104
Launch date 11 January 2017 2 July 2014
Place in performance rating 759 760
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $469

Technical info

Core clock speed 1093 MHz 745 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,399 gflops 2,289 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 640 1536
Texture fill rate 43.72 GTexel / s 95.36 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 225 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 3,540 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 80.19 GB / s 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5