NVIDIA GRID K220Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K220Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GRID K220Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
2x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 421

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 July 2014 vs 11 May 2013
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz vs 2500 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	539 vs 421

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

Around 10% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 745 MHz
Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
Around 7% better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 225 Watt
8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3805 vs 912
5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4868 vs 833
5.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4868 vs 833
Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 vs 2128
Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 vs 2128
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2660
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2660

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	823 MHz vs 745 MHz
Texture fill rate	102.0 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	2,448 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	122 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3805 vs 912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4868 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4868 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3679 vs 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3679 vs 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3351 vs 2660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3351 vs 2660

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

912

3805

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

539

421

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

833

4868

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

833

4868

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2128

3679

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2128

3679

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2660

3351

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2660

3351

Name	NVIDIA GRID K220Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
PassMark - G3D Mark	912	3805
PassMark - G2D Mark	539	421
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	833	4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	833	4868
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2128	3679
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2128	3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2660	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2660	3351
Geekbench - OpenCL		12810
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		39.934
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		705.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		13.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		78.867
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1466

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GRID K220Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK104	GK104
Launch date	2 July 2014	11 May 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$469
Place in performance rating	755	756
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	745 MHz	823 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	2,448 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1536	1536
Texture fill rate	95.36 GTexel / s	102.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	122 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	3,540 million
Boost clock speed		797 MHz
CUDA cores		1536
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Laptop size		large
SLI options		1
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB / s	160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
TXAA