NVIDIA GRID K220Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K220Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GRID K220Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K220Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 539 vs 333

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2 July 2014 vs 12 March 2014
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	539 vs 333

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

Around 28% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 745 MHz
Around 33% higher texture fill rate: 127.1 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
Around 33% better floating-point performance: 3,050 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 225 Watt
16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3828 vs 912
5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 vs 833
5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 vs 833
Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 2128
Around 75% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 2128
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2660
Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2660

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	954 MHz vs 745 MHz
Texture fill rate	127.1 GTexel / s vs 95.36 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	3,050 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	122 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3828 vs 912
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4501 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4501 vs 833
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 2128
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 2660
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 2660

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K220Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

912

3828

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

539

333

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

833

4501

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

833

4501

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2128

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2128

3718

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2660

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2660

3356

Name	NVIDIA GRID K220Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
PassMark - G3D Mark	912	3828
PassMark - G2D Mark	539	333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	833	4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	833	4501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2128	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2128	3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2660	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2660	3356
Geekbench - OpenCL		15023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		46.273
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		777.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		38.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		82.511
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1611

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GRID K220Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Code name	GK104	GK104
Launch date	2 July 2014	12 March 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$469
Place in performance rating	754	755
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	745 MHz	954 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	3,050 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1536	1536
Texture fill rate	95.36 GTexel / s	127.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt	122 Watt
Transistor count	3,540 million	3,540 million
Boost clock speed		993 MHz
CUDA cores		1536
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support		Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support		Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support		Up to 2048x1536
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Bus support		PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		large
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB / s	160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Standard memory configuration		GDDR5
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
BatteryBoost
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI
TXAA