Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs NVIDIA GRID K520
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 and NVIDIA GRID K520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 745 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 160
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 23 July 2013 |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 vs 160 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 vs 2536
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 vs 2536
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 1586
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 1586
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3354 vs 2418
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3354 vs 2418
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 vs 1626
- Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10864 vs 5885
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 vs 2536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 1586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 vs 2418 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 vs 2418 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 vs 1626 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10864 vs 5885 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K520
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA GRID K520 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2536 | 6782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2536 | 6782 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1586 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1586 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2418 | 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 | 3354 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 572 | 160 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1626 | 3516 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5885 | 10864 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.654 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 | NVIDIA GRID K520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | GK104 |
Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 724 | 760 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | 745 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |