NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA GRID K520
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M and NVIDIA GRID K520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 745 MHz
- Around 84% lower typical power consumption: 122 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3814 vs 3516
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 330 vs 160
- Around 38% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 vs 10864
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.273 vs 20.97
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 vs 3.244
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 82.511 vs 76.158
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 745 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3814 vs 3516 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 330 vs 160 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 vs 10864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 vs 20.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 vs 3.244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 vs 76.158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520
- 16.5x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 127.1 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 1536
- Around 61% better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 3,050 gflops
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.784 vs 777.677
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.277 vs 38.196
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 vs 4501
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 vs 4501
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 127.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 1536 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops vs 3,050 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 vs 777.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 vs 38.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 vs 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 vs 4501 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K520
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GRID K520 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3814 | 3516 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 330 | 160 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | 10864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.273 | 20.97 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 777.677 | 1063.784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 | 3.244 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.196 | 42.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.511 | 76.158 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | 6782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | 6782 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | NVIDIA GRID K520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 737 | 738 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 993 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 745 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2x 1536 |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 GTexel / s | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550D IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGRID K520
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics P6300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M vs
AMDRadeon 630
