NVIDIA GRID K520 vs ATI Radeon HD 4770
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K520 and ATI Radeon HD 4770 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 87.6x more texture fill rate: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 640
- 5.1x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,448 gflops vs 960.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 vs 893
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 160 vs 101
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 28 April 2009 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 24 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops vs 960.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 vs 893 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 vs 101 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4770
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 745 MHz
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8618 vs 3354
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8618 vs 3354
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8618 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8618 vs 3354 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K520
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4770
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K520 | ATI Radeon HD 4770 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 | 893 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 101 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10864 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 8618 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 8618 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K520 | ATI Radeon HD 4770 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | GK104 | RV740 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 28 April 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,599 | $109 |
Place in performance rating | 764 | 767 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 960.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 826 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 203 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |