NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 versus NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 and NVIDIA GeForce 840M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1306 MHz versus 1124 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 52.24 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 94% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,672 gflops versus 863.2 gflops
- 2.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5200 MHz versus 2002 MHz
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.997 versus 22.848
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 726.846 versus 162.594
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.442 versus 1.237
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.991 versus 21.15
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 155.196 versus 95.545
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 May 2016 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz versus 1029 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1306 MHz versus 1124 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.24 GTexel / s versus 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,672 gflops versus 863.2 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz versus 2002 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 versus 22.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 versus 162.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 versus 1.237 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 versus 21.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 versus 95.545 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 | 22.848 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 | 162.594 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 | 1.237 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 | 21.15 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 | 95.545 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1096 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5745 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GM108 |
| Date de sortie | 18 May 2016 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1247 | 1248 |
| Genre | Workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1306 MHz | 1124 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1033 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,672 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 52.24 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 83.2 GB / s | 16.02 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz | 2002 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 avec des autres
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 705M
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 630
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
