NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 38% higher texture fill rate: 151.0 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- Around 52% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1344
- Around 83% better floating-point performance: 4,833 gflops vs 2,634 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8909 vs 8276
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8909 vs 8276
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3709 vs 3627
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3709 vs 3627
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 25 August 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1344 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops vs 2,634 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8909 vs 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8909 vs 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 vs 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 vs 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Around 32% lower typical power consumption: 170 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 40% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5427 vs 3884
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 694 vs 618
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 170 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5427 vs 3884 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 694 vs 618 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3884 | 5427 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 618 | 694 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8909 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8909 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3354 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27798 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GM204 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 25 August 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 350 | 307 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q with others
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
ATIFireGL V7700
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 6650A
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 290
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
NVIDIATitan X Pascal
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile
