NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 797 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 902 MHz
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 618 vs 551
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27798 vs 24013
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 797 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 902 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 618 vs 551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27798 vs 24013 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 216.5 GTexel / s vs 151.0 GTexel / s
- Around 41% higher pipelines: 2880 vs 2048
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 5,196 gflops vs 4,833 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8096 vs 3884
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 8909
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 8909
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 216.5 GTexel / s vs 151.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 vs 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 5,196 gflops vs 4,833 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8096 vs 3884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 vs 8909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 vs 8909 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 vs 3709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 vs 3709 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3884 | 8096 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 618 | 551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8909 | 12657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8909 | 12657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27798 | 24013 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.178 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1816.61 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.435 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 88.889 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 355.166 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GM204 | GK110B |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 361 | 364 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,265 | |
| Price now | $833.98 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 5,196 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2880 |
| Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 7,080 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q with others
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 480
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
NVIDIATitan X Pascal
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile
