NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 210 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 210
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 34% better floating-point performance: 39.36 gflops vs 29.376 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 80 nm
- Around 61% lower typical power consumption: 30.5 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 500 MHz vs 400 MHz
| Launch date | 12 October 2009 vs 1 August 2008 |
| Core clock speed | 1402 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops vs 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 80 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 4.4 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 169 vs 126
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 38 vs 30
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1796 vs 497
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1796 vs 497
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1016 vs 688
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1016 vs 688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 4.4 billion / sec vs 4.16 GTexel / s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 169 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 38 vs 30 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1796 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1796 vs 497 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1016 vs 688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1016 vs 688 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 210
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 210 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 126 | 169 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 30 | 38 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2438 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 497 | 1796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 497 | 1796 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 688 | 1016 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 688 | 1016 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce 210 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GT218 | G86 |
| Launch date | 12 October 2009 | 1 August 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $29.49 | $79.99 |
| Place in performance rating | 1674 | 1460 |
| Price now | $32.99 | $79.99 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.81 | 3.05 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1402 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 16 | 16 |
| Floating-point performance | 39.36 gflops | 29.376 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 80 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| Pipelines | 16 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 4.16 GTexel / s | 4.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30.5 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 260 million | 210 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | S / PDIF |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA, DVIVGADisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVI |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| Height | 2.731" (6.9 cm) | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 6.60" (16.8 cm) | 6.6" (16.8 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 8.0 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR2 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce 210 with others
NVIDIAGeForce 210 vs
ATIRadeon VE
NVIDIAGeForce 210 vs
ATIRadeon HD 4350
NVIDIAGeForce 210 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 295
NVIDIAGeForce 210 vs
NVIDIAGeForce G210 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce 210 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 310M
NVIDIAGeForce 210 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6250
