NVIDIA GeForce 320M vs ATI Radeon HD 4650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 320M and ATI Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 320M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 48 Watt
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 59 vs 30
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2010 vs 10 September 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 48 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 vs 30 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4650
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 10x more pipelines: 320 vs 32
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 250 vs 210
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1891 vs 1735
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1891 vs 1735
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 32 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 250 vs 210 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1891 vs 1735 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1891 vs 1735 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 320M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 320M | ATI Radeon HD 4650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 210 | 250 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 59 | 30 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2474 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1735 | 1891 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1735 | 1891 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 320M | ATI Radeon HD 4650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | MCP89 | RV730 |
Launch date | 1 April 2010 | 10 September 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1582 | 1586 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 32 | 320 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt | 48 Watt |
Transistor count | 486 million | 514 million |
Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 193 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Shared memory | yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |