NVIDIA GeForce 410M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 410M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

NVIDIA GeForce 410M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 410M

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 1120 MHz
Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 23 Watt
Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1163 vs 719
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1570 vs 690
Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1163 vs 719
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1570 vs 690

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 January 2011 vs 3 September 2010
Core clock speed	1150 MHz vs 1120 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	12 Watt vs 23 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1163 vs 719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1570 vs 690
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1163 vs 719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1570 vs 690

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

Around 46% higher texture fill rate: 6.7 billion / sec vs 4.6 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
Around 95% better floating-point performance: 215.04 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 523 vs 264
Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 174 vs 129
Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1875 vs 1019
Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.184 vs 2.846
Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 172.058 vs 86.519
Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.944 vs 7.048
Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 859 vs 494
Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 859 vs 494

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	6.7 billion / sec vs 4.6 GTexel / s
Pipelines	96 vs 48
Floating-point performance	215.04 gflops vs 110.4 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	523 vs 264
PassMark - G2D Mark	174 vs 129
Geekbench - OpenCL	1875 vs 1019
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.184 vs 2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	172.058 vs 86.519
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	13.944 vs 7.048
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	859 vs 494
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	859 vs 494

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 410M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

264

523

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

129

174

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1019

1875

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.846

4.184

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

86.519

172.058

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.048

13.944

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

494

859

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1163

719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1570

690

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

494

859

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1163

719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1570

690

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 410M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
PassMark - G3D Mark	264	523
PassMark - G2D Mark	129	174
Geekbench - OpenCL	1019	1875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	2.846	4.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	86.519	172.058
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	7.048	13.944
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	494	859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1163	719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1570	690
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	494	859
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1163	719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1570	690
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.459
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		8.145

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 410M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi
Code name	GF119	GF108
Launch date	5 January 2011	3 September 2010
Place in performance rating	1561	1563
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	1150 MHz	1120 MHz
CUDA cores	48	96
Floating-point performance	110.4 gflops	215.04 gflops
Gigaflops	73
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	48	96
Texture fill rate	4.6 GTexel / s	6.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	12 Watt	23 Watt
Transistor count	292 million	585 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	DisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI	No outputs
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	1	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Shared memory	0	0
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory clock speed		800 MHz
Technologies
CUDA
Power management	8.0
3D Vision
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus