NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 523 MHz vs 500 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 1796 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 169 vs 89
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 September 2011 vs 15 July 2008 |
Core clock speed | 523 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 169 vs 89 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
- 6.7x more texture fill rate: 28 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 112 vs 48
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 280 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 454 vs 255
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 28 GTexel / s vs 4.18 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 112 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 280 gflops vs 100.42 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 454 vs 255 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 169 | 89 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 255 | 454 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 758 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1254 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1254 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1723 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1723 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF119 | G92 |
Launch date | 29 September 2011 | 15 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1347 | 1350 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $328.50 | |
Price now | $328.50 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 2.78 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 523 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 100.42 gflops | 280 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 112 |
Texture fill rate | 4.18 GTexel / s | 28 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores per GPU | 112 | |
Gigaflops | 420 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.37 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1796 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
PureVideo HD | ||
SLI |