NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).

NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 1796 MHz vs 1500 MHz
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1254 vs 475
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1254 vs 475
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1723 vs 657
2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1723 vs 657

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	29 September 2011 vs 28 June 2011
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed	1796 MHz vs 1500 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1254 vs 475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1254 vs 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1723 vs 657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1723 vs 657

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

Around 10% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 523 MHz
7.7x more texture fill rate: 32.2 billion / sec vs 4.18 GTexel / s
7x more pipelines: 336 vs 48
7.7x better floating-point performance: 772.8 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 1 GB
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 358 vs 169
7.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1864 vs 255
7.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 vs 758

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	575 MHz vs 523 MHz
Texture fill rate	32.2 billion / sec vs 4.18 GTexel / s
Pipelines	336 vs 48
Floating-point performance	772.8 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
Maximum memory size	1536 MB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	358 vs 169
PassMark - G3D Mark	1864 vs 255
Geekbench - OpenCL	5696 vs 758

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

169

358

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

255

1864

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

758

5696

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

475

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1254

475

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1723

657

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1723

657

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
PassMark - G2D Mark	169	358
PassMark - G3D Mark	255	1864
Geekbench - OpenCL	758	5696
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1254	475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1254	475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1723	657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1723	657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		14.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		533.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		1.681
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		31.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		66.187
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		296

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi 2.0
Code name	GF119	GF114
Launch date	29 September 2011	28 June 2011
Place in performance rating	1348	1349
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	523 MHz	575 MHz
Floating-point performance	100.42 gflops	772.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	48	336
Texture fill rate	4.18 GTexel / s	32.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	292 million	1,950 million
CUDA cores		336
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Bus support		PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size		large
SLI options		2-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1536 MB
Memory bandwidth	14.37 GB / s	72.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1796 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus
SLI