NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE and NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- 3.8x better floating-point performance: 384.0 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 3140 MHz vs 1796 MHz
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 706 vs 255
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 173 vs 169
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2344 vs 758
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2289 vs 1254
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3127 vs 1723
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2289 vs 1254
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3127 vs 1723
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 May 2012 vs 29 September 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops vs 100.42 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 3140 MHz vs 1796 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 706 vs 255 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 173 vs 169 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2344 vs 758 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 vs 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3127 vs 1723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 vs 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3127 vs 1723 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 706 | 255 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 173 | 169 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2344 | 758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.495 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 251.012 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.649 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 13.333 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.954 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1583 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2289 | 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3127 | 1723 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1583 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2289 | 1254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3127 | 1723 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE | NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GF108 | GF119 |
| Launch date | 4 May 2012 | 29 September 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $849.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1345 | 1348 |
| Price now | $849.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| CUDA cores | Up to 384 | |
| Floating-point performance | 384.0 gflops | 100.42 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 585 million | 292 million |
| Core clock speed | 523 MHz | |
| Texture fill rate | 4.18 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3140 MHz | 1796 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3\DDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.37 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| Verde Drivers | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE vs
NVIDIAGeForce 510 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE vs
AMDFirePro V3900
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE vs
AMDRadeon HD 8350G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE vs
AMDRadeon HD 8550 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M LE vs
IntelUHD Graphics 610
