NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M and NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
  • 4.8x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • 3.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 925 vs 255
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 197 vs 169
  • 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3191 vs 758
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1963 vs 1254
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2580 vs 1723
  • Around 57% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1963 vs 1254
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2580 vs 1723
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 22 March 2012 vs 29 September 2011
Pipelines 384 vs 48
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops vs 100.42 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1796 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 925 vs 255
PassMark - G2D Mark 197 vs 169
Geekbench - OpenCL 3191 vs 758
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1963 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2580 vs 1723
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1963 vs 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2580 vs 1723

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

  • Around 28% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 32 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 25 Watt vs 32 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
925
255
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
197
169
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3191
758
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1963
1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2580
1723
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1963
1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2580
1723
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 925 255
PassMark - G2D Mark 197 169
Geekbench - OpenCL 3191 758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 275.972
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.727
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 17.381
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1963 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2580 1723
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1963 1254
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2580 1723

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi 2.0
Code name GK107 GF119
Launch date 22 March 2012 29 September 2011
Place in performance rating 1346 1348
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 645 MHz
CUDA cores 384
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops 100.42 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 48
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 32 Watt 25 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 292 million
Core clock speed 523 MHz
Texture fill rate 4.18 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 API 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bus width 128bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1796 MHz
Memory type DDR3\GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0
Memory bandwidth 14.37 GB / s

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus