NVIDIA GeForce 610M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 610M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 610M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 12 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 78% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 113 vs 91
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2848 vs 2701
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2848 vs 2701

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

• 2x more pipelines: 96 vs 48
• 2x better floating-point performance: 258.05 gflops vs 129.02 gflops
• Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 478 vs 292
• Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2171 vs 1396
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.85 vs 2.747
• Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 vs 104.498
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.561 vs 0.27
• Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.109 vs 5.832
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.727 vs 9.69
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 960 vs 664
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 vs 1602
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 960 vs 664
• Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 vs 1602

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	292 478
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	113 91
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1396 2171
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.747 4.85
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	104.498 195.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.27 0.561
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.832 9.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9.69 16.727
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	664 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1602 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2848 2701
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	664 960
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1602 2210
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2848 2701

Compare specifications (specs)