NVIDIA GeForce 610M vs AMD Radeon HD 6480G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 610M and AMD Radeon HD 6480G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 610M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 672 MHz vs 444 MHz
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 290 vs 257
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 111 vs 81
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1373 vs 673
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 664 vs 592
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1602 vs 1082
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2848 vs 1696
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 664 vs 592
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1602 vs 1082
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2848 vs 1696
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 December 2011 vs 15 June 2011 |
Core clock speed | 672 MHz vs 444 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 290 vs 257 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 vs 81 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1373 vs 673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 664 vs 592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1602 vs 1082 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2848 vs 1696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 664 vs 592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1602 vs 1082 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2848 vs 1696 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6480G
- 5x more pipelines: 240 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 32 nm vs 40 nm
Pipelines | 240 vs 48 |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6480G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 610M | AMD Radeon HD 6480G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 290 | 257 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 111 | 81 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1373 | 673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.747 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.498 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.27 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.832 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.69 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 664 | 592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1602 | 1082 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2848 | 1696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 664 | 592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1602 | 1082 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2848 | 1696 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 610M | AMD Radeon HD 6480G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GF108 | Llano |
Launch date | 1 December 2011 | 15 June 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1527 | 1528 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 672 MHz | 444 MHz |
CUDA cores | 48 | |
Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 32 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 240 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1000 Million |
Video decoders | H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
Optimus |