NVIDIA GeForce 610M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 610M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 610M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- 2.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 12 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 78% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 113 versus 91
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2848 versus 2701
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2848 versus 2701
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 December 2011 versus 5 January 2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz versus 900 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 versus 91 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2848 versus 2701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2848 versus 2701 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
- 2x plus de pipelines: 96 versus 48
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 258.05 gflops versus 129.02 gflops
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 478 versus 292
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2171 versus 1396
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.85 versus 2.747
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.796 versus 104.498
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.561 versus 0.27
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 9.109 versus 5.832
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 16.727 versus 9.69
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 960 versus 664
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2210 versus 1602
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 960 versus 664
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2210 versus 1602
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 96 versus 48 |
| Performance á point flottant | 258.05 gflops versus 129.02 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 478 versus 292 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2171 versus 1396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.85 versus 2.747 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 195.796 versus 104.498 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.561 versus 0.27 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.109 versus 5.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.727 versus 9.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 960 versus 664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2210 versus 1602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 960 versus 664 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2210 versus 1602 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 610M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 610M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 292 | 478 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 113 | 91 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1396 | 2171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.747 | 4.85 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 104.498 | 195.796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.27 | 0.561 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 5.832 | 9.109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.69 | 16.727 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 664 | 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1602 | 2210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2848 | 2701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 664 | 960 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1602 | 2210 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2848 | 2701 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce 610M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GF108 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 1 December 2011 | 5 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1535 | 1503 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 900 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 672 MHz | 672 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 48 | 96 |
| Performance á point flottant | 129.02 gflops | 258.05 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 96 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 585 million | 585 million |
| Décodeurs de vidéo | H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10.8 billion / sec | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 28.8 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce 610M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce 610M vs
IntelGraphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
NVIDIAGeForce 610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 250M
NVIDIAGeForce 610M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6480G
NVIDIAGeForce 610M vs
NVIDIAGRID K1
NVIDIAGeForce 610M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8240
NVIDIAGeForce 610M vs
IntelHD Graphics 505
