NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 27 Watt
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 457 vs 289
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 203 vs 152
- Around 65% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1303 vs 791
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 703 vs 540
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1123 vs 1044
- Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 703 vs 540
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1123 vs 1044
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 5 January 2012 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 27 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 vs 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 vs 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 vs 791 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 703 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 vs 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 vs 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 vs 1044 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 738 MHz
- Around 2% higher texture fill rate: 6 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
- Around 69% better floating-point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1702 vs 1601
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1702 vs 1601
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 160 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1702 vs 1601 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1702 vs 1601 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 | 289 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | 152 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 | 791 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.13 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 703 | 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 | 1702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 | 540 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | 1044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 | 1702 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 437 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 800M | AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | GF117 | Caicos |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 5 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1490 | 1492 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 750 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 160 |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | 6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 27 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |