NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA Quadro 3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 64% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 450 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 703 vs 218
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1123 vs 374
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1601 vs 543
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 703 vs 218
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1123 vs 374
• 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1601 vs 543

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

• 3x more texture fill rate: 18 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
• 5x more pipelines: 240 vs 48
• 3x better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1021 vs 457
• Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 313 vs 203
• 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3721 vs 1303
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.95 vs 4.91
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 325.007 vs 109.13
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.794 vs 7.249
• Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.961 vs 15.218

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	457 1021
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	203 313
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1303 3721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.91 10.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	109.13 325.007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7.249 13.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15.218 27.961
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	703 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1123 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1601 543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	703 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1123 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1601 543

Compare specifications (specs)