NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA Quadro 3000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

NVIDIA GeForce 800M

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 64% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 450 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 703 vs 218
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1123 vs 374
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1601 vs 543
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 703 vs 218
3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1123 vs 374
2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1601 vs 543

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 March 2014 vs 22 February 2011
Core clock speed	738 MHz vs 450 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	703 vs 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1123 vs 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1601 vs 543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	703 vs 218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1123 vs 374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1601 vs 543

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

3x more texture fill rate: 18 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
5x more pipelines: 240 vs 48
3x better floating-point performance: 432.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 995 vs 457
Around 54% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 312 vs 203
2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3798 vs 1303
2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.95 vs 4.91
3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 325.007 vs 109.13
Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.794 vs 7.249
Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 27.961 vs 15.218

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	18 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
Pipelines	240 vs 48
Floating-point performance	432.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	2500 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	995 vs 457
PassMark - G2D Mark	312 vs 203
Geekbench - OpenCL	3798 vs 1303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.95 vs 4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	325.007 vs 109.13
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	13.794 vs 7.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	27.961 vs 15.218

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

457

995

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

203

312

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1303

3798

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.91

10.95

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

109.13

325.007

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.249

13.794

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15.218

27.961

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

703

218

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1123

374

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1601

543

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

703

218

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1123

374

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1601

543

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 800M	NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
PassMark - G3D Mark	457	995
PassMark - G2D Mark	203	312
Geekbench - OpenCL	1303	3798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.91	10.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	109.13	325.007
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	7.249	13.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	15.218	27.961
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	703	218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1123	374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1601	543
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	703	218
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1123	374
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1601	543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.865

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 800M	NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi
Code name	GF117	GF104
Launch date	17 March 2014	22 February 2011
Place in performance rating	1503	1500
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$398.96
Price now		$199.95
Value for money (0-100)		7.98
Technical info
Core clock speed	738 MHz	450 MHz
Floating-point performance	141.7 gflops	432.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	48	240
Texture fill rate	5.904 GTexel / s	18 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	1,950 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	80.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus