NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 500 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 77% better floating-point performance: 141.7 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 457 vs 122
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 203 vs 74
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 vs 15 June 2009 |
Core clock speed | 738 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops vs 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 vs 122 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 vs 74 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
- Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2058 vs 1601
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2058 vs 1601
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 8 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 14 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2058 vs 1601 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2058 vs 1601 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 457 | 122 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | 74 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1303 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.91 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 109.13 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.249 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 15.218 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1601 | 2058 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1123 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1601 | 2058 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 800M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF117 | G96C |
Launch date | 17 March 2014 | 15 June 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 1490 | 1488 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | 80 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 14 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |