NVIDIA GeForce 800M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 800M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 800M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • Around 48% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
  • Around 77% better floating-point performance: 141.7 gflops vs 80 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 457 vs 122
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 203 vs 74
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 17 March 2014 vs 15 June 2009
Core clock speed 738 MHz vs 500 MHz
Pipelines 48 vs 32
Floating-point performance 141.7 gflops vs 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 457 vs 122
PassMark - G2D Mark 203 vs 74

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M

  • Around 36% higher texture fill rate: 8 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
  • Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 14 Watt vs 15 Watt
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2058 vs 1601
  • Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2058 vs 1601
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 8 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 14 Watt vs 15 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2058 vs 1601
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2058 vs 1601

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 800M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
457
122
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
203
74
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1601
2058
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1601
2058
Name NVIDIA GeForce 800M NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M
PassMark - G3D Mark 457 122
PassMark - G2D Mark 203 74
Geekbench - OpenCL 1303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.91
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 109.13
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 7.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 15.218
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 703
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1601 2058
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 703
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1601 2058

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 800M NVIDIA GeForce GT 220M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 Tesla
Code name GF117 G96C
Launch date 17 March 2014 15 June 2009
Place in performance rating 1490 1488
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 738 MHz 500 MHz
Floating-point performance 141.7 gflops 80 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 48 32
Texture fill rate 5.904 GTexel / s 8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 14 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 314 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-II

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR2, GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus