NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs ATI Radeon HD 4670

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810M and ATI Radeon HD 4670 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• Around 31% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 59 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 407 vs 379
• Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 67 vs 38

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4670

• Around 2% higher core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 738 MHz
• 4.1x more texture fill rate: 24 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
• 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
• 3.4x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3285 vs 3035
• Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3285 vs 3035

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4670

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	407 379
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	67 38
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3035 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3035 3285

Compare specifications (specs)