NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs AMD Radeon R5 M230

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810M and AMD Radeon R5 M230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1076 vs 985
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3035 vs 2401
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1076 vs 985
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3035 vs 2401

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M230

• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 738 MHz
• 2.9x more texture fill rate: 17.1 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
• 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
• 3.9x better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
• 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 414 vs 411
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 128 vs 69
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4596 vs 1644
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.593 vs 4.403
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 143.386 vs 131.239
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 vs 1833
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 vs 1833

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M230

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	411 414
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	69 128
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1644 4596
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.403 8.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	131.239 143.386
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1076 985
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 1927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3035 2401
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1076 985
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 1927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3035 2401

Compare specifications (specs)