NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs AMD Radeon R5 M230
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810M and AMD Radeon R5 M230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1076 vs 985
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3035 vs 2401
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1076 vs 985
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3035 vs 2401
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 March 2014 vs 7 January 2014 |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1076 vs 985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3035 vs 2401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1076 vs 985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3035 vs 2401 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M230
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 825 MHz vs 738 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 17.1 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
- 6.7x more pipelines: 320 vs 48
- 3.9x better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 414 vs 407
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 128 vs 67
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4596 vs 1644
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.593 vs 4.403
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 143.386 vs 131.239
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 vs 1833
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 vs 1833
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz vs 738 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 320 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops vs 141.7 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 414 vs 407 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 128 vs 67 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 vs 1644 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.593 vs 4.403 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.386 vs 131.239 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 vs 1833 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M230
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 810M | AMD Radeon R5 M230 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 407 | 414 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 67 | 128 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1644 | 4596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.403 | 8.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 131.239 | 143.386 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1076 | 985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1833 | 1927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3035 | 2401 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1076 | 985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 | 1927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3035 | 2401 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 810M | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GF117 | Jet |
Launch date | 24 March 2014 | 7 January 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1439 | 1440 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 825 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 141.7 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 5.904 GTexel / s | 17.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,040 million |
Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
Compute units | 5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 16 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
HD3D | ||
Powerplay | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |