NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810M and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 706 MHz
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 861
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3035 vs 1443
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 861
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3035 vs 1443

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

• 3.8x more texture fill rate: 22.59 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
• 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
• 3.8x better floating-point performance: 542.2 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1091 vs 407
• 3.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 67
• Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3025 vs 1644
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 vs 4.403
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 vs 131.239
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 vs 1076
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 1076

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	407 1091
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	67 253
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1644 3025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.403 8.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	131.239 174.555
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1076 1892
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3035 1443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1076 1892
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1833 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3035 1443

Compare specifications (specs)