NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 810M and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce 810M

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 810M

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
Around 5% higher core clock speed: 738 MHz vs 706 MHz
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1833 vs 861
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3035 vs 1443
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 vs 861
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3035 vs 1443

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	24 March 2014 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	738 MHz vs 706 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1833 vs 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3035 vs 1443
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1833 vs 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3035 vs 1443

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

3.8x more texture fill rate: 22.59 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
3.8x better floating-point performance: 542.2 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz
2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1090 vs 411
3.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 69
Around 84% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3025 vs 1644
Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 vs 4.403
Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 vs 131.239
Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 vs 1076
Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 1076

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	22.59 GTexel / s vs 5.904 GTexel / s
Pipelines	384 vs 48
Floating-point performance	542.2 gflops vs 141.7 gflops
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	1090 vs 411
PassMark - G2D Mark	254 vs 69
Geekbench - OpenCL	3025 vs 1644
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	8.649 vs 4.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	174.555 vs 131.239
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1892 vs 1076
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1892 vs 1076

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

411

1090

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

254

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

1644

3025

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.403

8.649

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

131.239

174.555

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1076

1892

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1833

861

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3035

1443

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1076

1892

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1833

861

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3035

1443

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 810M	NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
PassMark - G3D Mark	411	1090
PassMark - G2D Mark	69	254
Geekbench - OpenCL	1644	3025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.403	8.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	131.239	174.555
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1076	1892
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1833	861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3035	1443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1076	1892
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1833	861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3035	1443
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		0.642
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		11.732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		16.3
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 810M	NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GF117	GK107
Launch date	24 March 2014	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	1440	1442
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$109.94
Price now		$79
Value for money (0-100)		17.59
Technical info
Core clock speed	738 MHz	706 MHz
Floating-point performance	141.7 gflops	542.2 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	48	384
Texture fill rate	5.904 GTexel / s	22.59 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	45 Watt
Transistor count	585 million	1,270 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model		5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	44.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	2800 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus