NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs ATI Radeon HD 3650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and ATI Radeon HD 3650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 10 GTexel / s vs 5.8 GTexel / s
• Around 38% better floating-point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 174 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
• Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 65 Watt
• 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
• Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 2162
• Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 2162

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 3650

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 120 vs 96

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 3650

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 2162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3349 2162

Compare specifications (specs)