NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce 820M

NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 50% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 540 MHz
Around 33% higher pipelines: 96 vs 72
Around 28% better floating-point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 187.49 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 1580 MHz
Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 495 vs 461
Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 113 vs 62
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 2502
Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 2502

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 March 2015 vs 2 February 2010
Core clock speed	810 MHz vs 540 MHz
Pipelines	96 vs 72
Floating-point performance	240.0 gflops vs 187.49 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed	1802 MHz vs 1580 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	495 vs 461
PassMark - G2D Mark	113 vs 62
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349 vs 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349 vs 2502

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 45 Watt
2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8132 vs 2775

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	12.96 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	43 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	8132 vs 2775

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

495

461

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

113

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2775

8132

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

2502

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

2502

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 820M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark	495	461
PassMark - G2D Mark	113	62
Geekbench - OpenCL	2775	8132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	7.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	161.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.686
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	14.257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	22.768
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349	2502
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349	2502
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	847

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 820M	NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GK107	GT215
Launch date	21 March 2015	2 February 2010
Place in performance rating	1475	1477
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Technical info
Core clock speed	810 MHz	540 MHz
Floating-point performance	240.0 gflops	187.49 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	96	72
Texture fill rate	10 GTexel / s	12.96 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	43 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	727 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length		175 mm
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	10.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s	25.28 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1802 MHz	1580 MHz
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers