NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 50% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 540 MHz
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 96 vs 72
  • Around 28% better floating-point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 187.49 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 1580 MHz
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 495 vs 461
  • Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 113 vs 62
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 2502
  • Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 2502
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 March 2015 vs 2 February 2010
Core clock speed 810 MHz vs 540 MHz
Pipelines 96 vs 72
Floating-point performance 240.0 gflops vs 187.49 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Memory clock speed 1802 MHz vs 1580 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 495 vs 461
PassMark - G2D Mark 113 vs 62
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 vs 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 vs 2502

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

  • Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 12.96 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
  • Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8132 vs 2772
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 12.96 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 43 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 8132 vs 2772

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
495
461
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
113
62
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2772
8132
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
2502
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3349
2502
Name NVIDIA GeForce 820M NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 495 461
PassMark - G2D Mark 113 62
Geekbench - OpenCL 2772 8132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.765
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 161.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.686
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 14.257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 22.768
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3349 2502
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1195
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1447
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3349 2502
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 847

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce 820M NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Tesla 2.0
Code name GK107 GT215
Launch date 21 March 2015 2 February 2010
Place in performance rating 1477 1479
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 810 MHz 540 MHz
Floating-point performance 240.0 gflops 187.49 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 72
Texture fill rate 10 GTexel / s 12.96 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 43 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 727 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 175 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.5 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 25.28 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1802 MHz 1580 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers