NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 606 MHz
• 2.1x more texture fill rate: 10 GTexel / s vs 4.85 GTexel / s
• 6x more pipelines: 96 vs 16
• 5.1x better floating-point performance: 240.0 gflops vs 46.98 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 1580 MHz
• 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 495 vs 121
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 113 vs 106

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

• Around 80% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2851 vs 2775

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 380M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	495 121
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	113 106
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2775 2851

Compare specifications (specs)