NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs Intel HD Graphics 5500

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and Intel HD Graphics 5500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Intel HD Graphics 5500

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
8.1x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 100 MHz
4x more pipelines: 96 vs 24
Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2789 vs 2262
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.765 vs 3.422
Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1195 vs 781
Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1447 vs 754
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1397
Around 53% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 vs 781
Around 92% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1447 vs 754
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1397
3.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 847 vs 233

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 March 2015 vs 5 September 2014
Core clock speed	810 MHz vs 100 MHz
Pipelines	96 vs 24
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	2789 vs 2262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	7.765 vs 3.422
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1195 vs 781
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1447 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349 vs 1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1195 vs 781
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1447 vs 754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349 vs 1397
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	847 vs 233

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5500

A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 594 vs 490
2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 230 vs 114
Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 195.811 vs 161.305

Specifications (specs)
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	594 vs 490
PassMark - G2D Mark	230 vs 114
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	195.811 vs 161.305

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 5500

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

490

594

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

114

230

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2789

2262

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7.765

3.422

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

161.305

195.811

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1195

781

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1447

754

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

1397

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1195

781

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1447

754

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3349

1397

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

847

233

Name	NVIDIA GeForce 820M	Intel HD Graphics 5500
PassMark - G3D Mark	490	594
PassMark - G2D Mark	114	230
Geekbench - OpenCL	2789	2262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	7.765	3.422
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	161.305	195.811
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.686
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	14.257
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	22.768
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1195	781
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1447	754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3349	1397
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1195	781
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1447	754
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3349	1397
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	847	233

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce 820M	Intel HD Graphics 5500
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Generation 8.0
Code name	GK107	Broadwell GT2
Launch date	21 March 2015	5 September 2014
Place in performance rating	1444	1478
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Core clock speed	810 MHz	100 MHz
Floating-point performance	240.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Pipelines	96	24
Texture fill rate	10 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	45 Watt	15 Watt
Transistor count	1,270 million	1,300 million
Boost clock speed		950 MHz
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x1
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1802 MHz
Memory type	DDR3
Shared memory	0	1
Technologies
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers
Quick Sync