NVIDIA GeForce 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 1802x more memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2789 vs 1946
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.765 vs 6.705
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.305 vs 100.391
- Around 56% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.686 vs 0.441
- Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.257 vs 8.146
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.768 vs 20.64
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1195 vs 977
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 1833
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 vs 977
- Around 83% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 1833
- 4.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 847 vs 192
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 March 2015 vs 27 March 2014 |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2789 vs 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 vs 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 vs 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 vs 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 vs 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 vs 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 vs 192 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 15.26 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- Around 53% better floating-point performance: 366.3 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 490
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 114
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 vs 1447
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 vs 1447
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 810 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 vs 490 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 vs 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 vs 1447 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 490 | 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 114 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2789 | 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1447 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 820M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GK107 | GK208B |
Launch date | 21 March 2015 | 27 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 1444 | 1488 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Price now | $34.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 954 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 10 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 292 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |