NVIDIA GeForce 820M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 820M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- 1802x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1802 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2789 versus 1946
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.765 versus 6.705
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 161.305 versus 100.391
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.686 versus 0.441
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 14.257 versus 8.146
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.768 versus 20.64
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1195 versus 977
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 versus 1833
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1195 versus 977
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 versus 1833
- 4.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 847 versus 192
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 21 March 2015 versus 27 March 2014 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2789 versus 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 versus 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 versus 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 versus 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 versus 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 versus 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 versus 192 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 810 MHz
- Environ 53% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 15.26 GTexel / s versus 10 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 192 versus 96
- Environ 53% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 366.3 gflops versus 240.0 gflops
- 2.4x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 45 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 versus 490
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 versus 114
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1494 versus 1447
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1494 versus 1447
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 810 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s versus 10 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 192 versus 96 |
Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops versus 240.0 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 45 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 versus 490 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 versus 114 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 versus 1447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 versus 1447 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 820M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 490 | 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 114 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2789 | 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.765 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 161.305 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.686 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.257 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.768 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1195 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1447 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1195 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1447 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 847 | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 820M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | GK107 | GK208B |
Date de sortie | 21 March 2015 | 27 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1444 | 1488 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | 954 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 240.0 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 10 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 19 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 292 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Verde Drivers | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |